EntertainmentMarch 10, 2008 3:12 pm
Ashley Wilkens of Carmel, Ind., got pregnant at 16, delivered a boy and placed the baby for adoption. Now 18, she works in retail sales, is studying for her GED and has filed paperwork to join the Navy.

She stayed in high school halfway through her pregnancy and says her peers seemed fine with it.

"It just seems like it’s OK and it was accepted. People would say: ‘Look, how cute. You have a little baby bump. That’s adorable.’ "

But even though friends and media portrayals may be more accepting of teen pregnancy today than in the past, the "baby bump" still generates a wide range of reactions when the mother-to-be is a teenager.

 

ADOPTION:Recent movies open door for advocacy groups

Think of the comments in the blogosphere when 16-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears, star of Nickelodeon’s Zoey 101, announced her pregnancy. She’s reportedly due in May.

Or the barrage of conflicting opinions generated by the movie Juno, about a fictional 16-year-old with plenty of attitude who gets pregnant and finds her baby an adoptive home. It was nominated for an Oscar for best picture, but the kudos have been somewhat mixed, depending upon attitudes toward teen pregnancy.

"In some quarters, it’s frowned on, and in other quarters, it may be discouraged but not so frowned upon," says Thomas Cottle, a sociologist and psychologist at Boston University.

Acceptance may be cultural

Though many say society has become more accepting of all kinds of once-taboo issues, including teen pregnancy, Cottle says he isn’t sure it’s actually more accepted.

"There is not one culture in America," he says. "It is a very complicated and complex culture. With all these races and ethnic groups and social classes and religions, this thing called ‘teen pregnancy’ is experienced in very different ways and it’s thought about in very different ways."

Sarah Brown, CEO of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, is concerned about the message girls will get from Juno, which she believes is unrealistic. The movie paints a portrait of a pregnant teen who is not only extremely self-possessed but who also has a very supportive family.

"Adults understand the bigger picture and what the risks are of adolescence and childbearing," Brown says. "Adolescents see it through the lens of the ‘me generation.’ Adolescence is also a self-absorbed time. If the baby got handed off and she got the boyfriend back (as happens in Juno), what’s the problem?"

Brown says part of her concern is the film’s tone toward unintended pregnancy. "We’re all now tolerant and non-judgmental. Apparently that now extends to getting pregnant and having babies," she says.

"Less than 2% of teens place their babies up for adoption. The vast majority keep them. We have large numbers of teen mothers, whereas in an earlier time, we had large numbers of married teen mothers." Most teens giving birth now are single, she says.

Deborah Roffman, who works with elementary through high school students as a human sexuality educator in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., says Juno is a story "about a remarkably resilient young person, and that’s why there’s a movie about her."

"She’s atypical. She’s also atypical in that she has a support system," which most pregnant teens do not have, Roffman says.

Kids of teens face challenges

Research on teen mothers shows that their children often are raised in poverty because teenage mothers are less educated and likely to have fewer job skills.

Studies also suggest that children of teenage mothers have lower math, reading and vocabulary test scores than children of older mothers, and that when children of teen mothers become adolescents themselves, they have lower odds of completing high school.

But young people don’t look at the long-term picture, says psychologist David Walsh, founder of the National Institute on Media and the Family, a non-profit research group based in Minneapolis. "They don’t think of all the realistic implications that are coming down the road. They focus on how wonderful this is going to be to have this wonderful baby who I can love and who will love me."

Pop culture professor Gary Hoppenstand of Michigan State University disagrees with those who suggest Juno makes teen pregnancy seem cool.

"Moral issues aside, you have a younger person who got into a situation and, in a sense, is taking responsibility for it and resisting tremendous social pressure," says Hoppenstand, 53. "It’s showing a kind of strength and empowerment for the young that older, traditional people will not understand or comprehend.

"In very traditional values, there are absolutes and no gray areas. It’s either right or wrong. What’s being represented here in the popular culture is that there are gray areas and no absolutes. Young people recognize and understand that."

TechnologyMarch 9, 2008 5:46 am

Apple breathed new life into its once-floundering Apple TV thanks to a recent software update, but it’s got a major competitor to deal with: Vudu, a set-top device with more than eight times as many movies to rent. Which box deserves a place next to your TV?

Setup

A cinch, for both Apple TV and Vudu. Each box comes with more or less the same connections: you get HDMI (with resolutions up to 1080p), component and composite video outputs, analog and Toslink audio outputs, and Ethernet ports (Vudu also has an S-video input). Once they’re connected and ready, each device boots up and launches their individual setup wizards, and within minutes, you’re up and running. For Apple TV, there’s the extra step of syncing up with an iTunes library, although you’re also free to run Apple TV as a stand-alone box. Apple TV also has the option of going Wi-Fi for its network connection, while the Vudu is restricted to Ethernet—although one could argue that speedy wired Ethernet is the way to go when it comes to downloading massive HD movies. Winner: Tie

What you get

Movies: With its catalog of 5,000+ films (about 3,600 rentals, the rest for purchase), Vudu clearly beats the pants off of Apple TV in the movie department. And we’re not just talking grade-Z movies, either—a quick perusal of Vudu’s collection reveals a broad swath of movies, including the latest releases (such as "Into the Wild," "The Darjeeling Limited," "30 Days of Night," and "Gone Baby Gone") and older catalog titles ("Breakfast at Tiffany’s," all the old "Star Trek" movies, "Once Upon a Time in the West," and so on). Apple TV, meanwhile, is still struggling to build up its rental library; as of this week, fewer than 500 rentals were available via iTunes (another 200 or so are for purchase only). That said, both Vudu and Apple TV have about 100 HD movies on tap. Winner: Vudu (by a mile)

TV shows: Here’s where Apple turns the tables on Vudu. iTunes (and by extension, Apple TV) has literally thousands of TV episodes on hand from all the major networks, save NBC. It’s a TV lover’s dream. Vudu, on the other hand, has only 14 shows to choose from, including "24," "Arrested Development," "Prison Break," "NYPD Blue" (seasons one and two only), and "Shark". Not bad, but Vudu has a lot of catching up to do. Also worth nothing: neither Apple TV nor Vudu offers TV shows in HD (as does the Xbox Video Marketplace). Winner: Apple TV

Extras: Vudu may reign supreme with its impressive selection of movies, but Apple TV’s got it trumped with its extras, including full access to the iTunes Music Store, thousands of podcasts, access to Flickr and .Mac slideshows, and YouTube support. Vudu’s got its movies and TV shows, but that’s pretty much it. Winner: Apple TV

Interface

As with most Apple products, navigating the Apple TV’s various screens is a snap, even for novices, and Apple TV’s new interface is a hands-down improvement over the original. I especially like the fact that pressing and holding the "menu" key brings up a main-menu overlay, no matter where you are in the menu structure. But while Vudu’s menus aren’t quite as slick as Apple’s, navigating through Vudu’s movie catalog is a breeze thanks to the jog wheel in the remote (which also lets you fast-forward and reverse while watching a movie). I also love that Vudu lets you click on an actor’s or director’s name to see all their available movies—a browsing feature that’s sorely lacking in Apple TV. Finally, Vudu lets you add movies you want to see later to a "wish list"—another feature that’s missing from the Apple box. Winner: Vudu

Video quality

SD video: Apple TV’s standard-def video quality has been suspect from the beginning, and it remains so now. SD movies and TV shows look way too soft, almost out-of-focus soft, in fact. Very disappointing. Vudu’s SD offerings look much better—shy of DVD quality, mind you, but still reasonably sharp, with digital artifacts kept to a relative minimum. Winner: Vudu

HD video: While Vudu scores with its solid SD video quality, it comes up a bit shy with its HD movies. After repeated A-B viewings of scenes from the HD rental of "Transformers," I felt Apple TV’s HD video looked a bit sharper, with solid-looking colors and few artifacts even during the most furious of action scenes. Vudu’s HD looked a little softer to me, with muddy-looking colors that seemed to float during darker scenes, as well as noticeable edge enhancement (which resulted in "jaggies" along the edges of objects). Winner: Apple TV

Sound quality

When I first reviewed Vudu, I noticed that the sound on many movies (including recent flicks like "Spider-Man 2") seemed to be in mono. Well, Vudu engineers clearly took that criticism to heart and made some changes, because try though I might, I couldn’t find any movies this time with the mono bug. Indeed, the movies on Apple TV and Vudu both sounded excellent, with the DD 5.1 mix for "Transformers" sounding appropriately thunderous and aggressive. Keep in mind, however, that neither Apple TV nor Vudu offer all its movies in full Dolby Digital—understandable for, say, "Casablanca," but less so for newer, HD movies like "X-Men." Winner: Tie

Instant movie viewing

One of Vudu’s big selling points is that it lets you start watching movies from the instant your click "Rent now" (thanks to peer-to-peer video sharing—click here for more details) and the box absolutely delivers. Testing it in Brooklyn over Road Runner digital cable, Vudu’s movies are indeed ready for instant viewing, including HD titles. But while Apple TV’s movies didn’t load instantly, they were ready for watching within less than a minute of pressing "Rent"—and that held true to HD videos, as well. So although Vudu can claim a moral victory in the "instant viewing" category, most viewers will hardly notice the difference. Winner: Vudu (but only by a whisker)

Movie portability

Video you can take with you is a huge trend in tech, and for now at least, it’s something that Vudu fails to address—once you rent a movie on Vudu, it stays in the box, no matter what. Apple TV, meanwhile, gets it half right; if you download an iTunes rental on your Mac or PC first, you get the option of transferring it to your iPod, iPhone, or the Apple TV. But if you rent a movie directly over the Apple TV, it’s stuck in the box—you won’t be allowed to transfer it to a portable player. Winner: Neither really, although Apple TV comes closest.

Price

Hardware: Vudu just dropped the price of its main, 100GB offering by $100, to $299. (There’s also a 1TB Vudu available—the Vudu XL—for a whopping $999, but that’s more for the home-integration market.) The 40GB version of Apple TV goes for $229, while the 120GB model sells for $329. In other words, both boxes are still hovering around the $300 mark, which may still be too high for most viewers. Winner: Tie

Videos: Both Apple TV and Vudu have the same rental-price structure: $3.99 for new releases, and $2.99 for older, catalog titles. (Both services let you keep rented movies for 30 days; once you hit "play", you then have 24 hours to watch your video). For HD movies, Apple TV charges $4.99 for new releases and $3.99 for older titles, while Vudu charges a bit more: $5.99 for the latest and greatest titles, and $3.99 for catalog. Winner: Apple TV (just barely)

And the winner is…

Sorry folks, but there’s no knockout winner here—and even when we go to the cards, both Apple TV and Vudu managed to land an impressive number of points. In the end, you’ll need to ask yourself what your priorities are in a video set-top box to make the best decision. Ultimately, I think Apple TV is a better all-around device, especially for Mac-centric users who love TV shows and want to use their Apple TV as a music and/or podcast jukebox. But until Apple builds up the meager movie selection on iTunes, Vudu takes the prize for movie lovers—although I wish Vudu’s HD video quality was a bit better. And both boxes could still use another price cut.

EntertainmentMarch 7, 2008 12:37 am

BOSTON - Researchers have uncovered a rare photograph of a young Helen Keller with her teacher Anne Sullivan, nearly 120 years after it was taken on Cape Cod. The photograph, shot in July 1888 in Brewster, shows an 8-year-old Helen sitting outside in a light-colored dress, holding Sullivan’s hand and cradling one of her beloved dolls.

Experts on Keller’s life believe it could be the earliest photo of the two women together and the only one showing the blind and deaf child with a doll — the first word Sullivan spelled for Keller after they met in 1887 — according to the New England Historic Genealogical Society, which now has the photo.

"It’s really one of the best images I’ve seen in a long, long time," said Helen Selsdon, an archivist at the American Foundation for the Blind, where Keller worked for more than 40 years. "This is just a huge visual addition to the history of Helen and Annie."

For more than a century, the photograph has belonged to the family of Thaxter Spencer, an 87-year-old man in Waltham.

Spencer’s mother, Hope Thaxter Parks, often stayed at the Elijah Cobb House on Cape Cod during the summer as a child. In July 1888, she played with Keller, whose family had traveled from Tuscumbia, Ala., to vacation in Massachusetts.

Spencer, who doesn’t know which of his relatives took the picture, told the society that his mother, four years younger than Helen, remembered Helen exploring her face with her hands.

In June, Spencer donated a large collection of photo albums, letters, diaries and other heirlooms to the genealogical society, which preserves artifacts from New England families for future research.

"I never thought much about it," Spencer said in a statement released by the society. "It just seemed like something no one would find very interesting." Spencer has recently been hospitalized and could not be reached for comment.

It wasn’t until recently that staff at the society realized the photograph’s significance. Advocates for the blind say they had never heard of it, though after they announced its discovery Wednesday they learned it had published in 1987 in a magazine on Cape Cod and a half-century earlier in The Boston Globe. It is unclear whether there was more than one copy of the photograph.

D. Brenton Simons, the society’s president and CEO, said the photograph offers a glimpse of what was a very important time in Keller’s life.

Sullivan was hired in 1887 to teach Keller, who had been left blind and deaf after an illness at the age of 1 1/2. With her new teacher, Keller learned language from words spelled manually into her hand. Not quite 7, the girl went from an angry, frustrated child without a way to communicate to an eager scholar.

While "doll" was the first word spelled into her hand, Helen finally comprehended the meaning of language a few weeks later with the word "water," as famously depicted in the film "The Miracle Worker." Sullivan stayed at her side until her death in 1936, and Keller became a world-famous author and humanitarian. She died in 1968.

Jan Seymour-Ford, a research librarian at the Perkins School for the Blind in Watertown, which both Sullivan and Keller attended, said she was moved to see how deeply connected the women were, even in 1888.

"The way Anne is gazing so intently at Helen, I think it’s a beautiful portrait of the devotion that lasted between these two women all of Anne’s life," Seymour-Ford said.

Selsdon said the photograph is valuable because it shows many elements of Keller’s childhood: that devotion, Sullivan’s push to teach Helen outdoors and Helen’s attachment to her baby dolls, one of which was given to her upon Sullivan’s arrival as her teacher.

"It’s a beautiful composition," she said. "It’s not even the individual elements. It’s the fact that it has all of the components."

EntertainmentMarch 6, 2008 12:08 pm

Now the legend has been joined in the record books by Jon Fitch. The Indiana native’s unanimous decision victory over Chris Wilson was his eighth straight octagon victory, tying the UFC record.

“It’s a huge honor to be considered along with a legend like Royce,” said Fitch, who upped his career record to 16-2. “I don’t go thinking about stuff like that while I’m training. All I ever say is I want the best matches people can give me. I’ll fight anyone. I want tough opponents.”

Since making his UFC debut in December 2005 with a unanimous decision win over Brock Larson, Fitch disposed of Josh Burkman (submission); Thialgo Alves (TKO); Kuniyoshi Hironaka (unanimous decision); Luigi Fiorvanti (submission); Roan Carneiro (submission) and Diego Sanchez (split decision) before Saturday’s win.

Entertainment 12:02 pm

Opinions about Silva

With Anderson Silva’s victory over an elite opponent like Dan Henderson, is he the new Chuck Liddell of the UFC as its most dominant fighter?

Dan Wetzel’s outstanding column on Anderson last week hit the nail on the head. He’s dominating MMA now the way Tyson did boxing in the late 1980s and then again in the mid-1990s. He’s not only beating elite fighters, he’s destroying them, which may be even better than what Tyson was doing. Tyson lost to the best fighters he faced (Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis), but Silva isn’t letting them get out of the second round.

 

Presently, there seems to be no challenger who poses a threat of getting Anderson Silva’s middleweight championship belt after his victory over Dan Henderson. Do you think he would consider moving up to the light heavyweight division? If so, what are the chances of him being the light heavyweight champion? The 205-pound division is stacked, but he could easily get a crack at that belt since he is the middleweight champion and considered the best fighter pound-for-pound. Henderson was very competitive and was a champion at both middleweight and light heavyweight. There would absolutely be no doubt that Anderson Silva is the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world if he gets the light heavyweight belt.

Silva doesn’t have to move up to prove he’s the best, because he’s already proven it. What more does he need to do? If Silva were to move up, it would either be because he could no longer make the 185-pound middleweight limit or to take a monster fight the public is demanding to see. But right now, light heavyweight champion Rampage Jackson has plenty of big challenges in his own division. I also don’t believe Silva has trouble making 185, so there is no compelling reason for him to go. Wanderlei Silva plans to drop to 185 after his May 24 fight with Keith Jardine and UFC president Dana White said Tuesday he wouldn’t mind a Silva vs. Silva bout sometime later this year. White said he wouldn’t stand in the way if Anderson Silva wanted to move to light heavyweight. “What else is there for him to prove at middleweight?” White said. “If he comes to me and says he wants to fight at light heavyweight, I can’t argue with him.” But White said Silva has given him no indications he’s planning to do that.

UncategorizedMarch 3, 2008 1:18 pm

Tag clouds and tag pages; check out Ultimate Tag Warrior plugin for creating these.
Add a “Related Posts” feature such as Contextual Related Posts plugin for WordPress.
Top Ten posts feature to display most popular posts
Add “next” and “previous” post buttons
Build inbound links
Title tags – use SEO Title Tag plugin for WordPress to assign unique title tags to individual posts.
Claim your blog at Technorati and use Technorati tags
Use “sticky” posts that always appear at the top of the page as a way to add a keywords-rich introduction to category pages. Adhesive plugin works for this.
Use the Buzzlogic tool to find out which bloggers are most influential in conversations – refer to them and try to get them to link to you.
Get into other bloggers’ blog rolls (trackbacks and comments won’t help in link gain.

Business, EntertainmentMarch 2, 2008 3:11 am

NEW YORK - Even giving away something for free can turn into a hassle in New York.

A video-sharing Web site set out to observe Leap Day by handing out prizes worth up to $29 on Feb. 29 outside Union Square Park.

As the clocked toward the event’s scheduled time — 2:29 p.m. — people shouting "Make it rain!" and "Give me my money!" trampled one another and mobbed the costumed representatives of CashTomato.com

Some people wrested bags of cash-stuffed envelopes and other items from the CashTomato workers, said Jason Buzi, who identified himself as the company’s senior vice president.

The prize givers weren’t the only ones who were overwhelmed.

"Before I knew it, I was on the floor" and under a pile of people, said Anabel DeJesus, 17. She left without any prize. "It’s not worth it," she told the Daily News.

Police didn’t have any information Saturday on whether anyone was injured or arrested.

Buzi said CashTomato has staged relatively uneventful giveaways in other cities, and he was startled by the Manhattan mayhem.

"It turned out to be a lot of aggressive people," he said. "Maybe next time, I would plan this better."

EntertainmentMarch 1, 2008 12:39 am

In the brawl for the hearts and wallets of young male fans, ultimate fighting has boxing and wrestling on the ropes.

 

Sometimes success hinges on the little things. Outlawing the eye-gouge, for instance, or banning the crotch kick.

Such rule changes have helped to turn mixed martial arts from a virtual outlaw operation into one of the fastest growing sports in the country, muting critics, enticing advertisers, and taking on its rivals—boxing and professional wrestling—for both fans and market share.

The sport Senator John McCain once famously branded as “human cockfighting” rakes in more than $200 million in pay-per-view loot, has broadcast deals with Spike TV, Fox Sports Net and MyNetwork, and has spawned a reality series, The Ultimate Fighter, which along with the fights grabbed more 18- to 34-year-old male eyeballs than either Nascar or the N.B.A. playoff games.

Robert Jacobson, president and C.E.O. of In Demand Networks, which provides about 90 percent of the cable industry’s pay-per-view content, notes that mixed martial arts accounted for virtually no revenue on his network in 2004. “Now it’s neck and neck with boxing, and is a little ahead of wrestling,” he says.

The current leader in the M.M.A. business, Ultimate Fighting Championship, went from $45 million in pay-per-view revenues in 2005 to $222 million in 2006 and appears to have held that number for 2007, according to Deana Myers, a senior analyst at SNL Kagan. U.F.C.’s revenue numbers are close to, and at points have exceeded, those reported by HBO, the main boxing pay-per-view provider, and those of World Wrestling Entertainment, the dominant force in professional wrestling.

Mixed martial arts (M.M.A.) has grown in popularity despite having had less financial backing and nowhere near the distribution network of boxing or wrestling to publicize its matches. Newspapers ignore M.M.A. events M.M.A. and the major networks eschew them. Both New York And Massachusetts, two of the most important states from a marketing and distribution standpoint, ban the matches altogether.

Marc Ratner, the Ultimate Fighting Championship vice president of government and regulatory affairs, says the problem is the long shadow cast by the bad-old days of the sport—“when it was advertised as no-holds barred,” and often left a pool of blood on the mat to prove it.

But momentum is building in M.M.A.’s favor. Thirty-two states have sanctioned the sport, with 10 of them coming on board over the last 14 months alone.

Ratner’s own conversion is telling. Back in 1995, he called the sport  “barbaric,” and, as the respected head of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, he helped Senator McCain lead a largely successful charge to outlaw ultimate fighting across the country.

Then, in 2000, members of the sport and the athletic commissions in Nevada and New Jersey hammered out medical and judging standards, weight limits, and restrictions on fighting techniques for M.M.A. Nevada hosted its first M.M.A. fight the next year. “It became something you could regulate,” says Ratner, who joined U.F.C. in 2007.

tetsuya ufc